Skip to main content

In Re Johnson

Citations

  • 475 P.2d 841
  • 3 Cal. 3d 404
  • 90 Cal. Rptr. 569
  • 1970 Cal. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Leary should be applied “largely prospectively”
  • holding that Leary should be applied 'largely prospectively'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.