Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/24/2001
In Re John M.
Citations
- 36 P.3d 772
- 201 Ariz. 424
- 363 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22
- 2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that racial slurs were \likely to provoke a violent reaction when addressed to an ordinary citizen of African-American descent\
- holding that racial slurs were ‘‘likely to provoke a violent reaction when addressed to an ordinary citizen of African-American descent’’
- upholding disorderly conduct adjudication where juvenile shouted racial epithets constituting fighting words at a specific individual
- looking to “established and widely used” dictionaries to define “gesture” when legislature did not provide definition
- appellant leaning out of a car window and yelling “fuck you, you god damn n****r” uttered fighting words
- ‘the term is generally regarded as virtually taboo because of the legacy of racial hatred that underlies the history of its use among whites’ . . .
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timmer, Gemmill, Fidel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Marcus Deshaun Tucker, Clifton James Cuttler II and Andre Lavelle ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-24· cited 27×
- In Re James P.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-01· cited 19×
- In Re Nickolas S.Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-01-10· cited 18×
- Cruff v. A.R.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-05-11· cited 16×
- Frank R. v. Mother Goose AdoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-02-10· cited 15×
- Cruff v. H.K.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-02-17· cited 14×
- In Re Reymundo F.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-27· cited 13×
- In re Amber S.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31· cited 10×
- State v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-04· cited 8×
- Adrian E. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-04-05· cited 7×
- In Re Natalie Z.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-23· cited 6×
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. CantillonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-09-21· cited 5×
- In Re R.E.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-01-06· cited 4×
- State v. LiebenguthConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-04-17· cited 4×
- Columbus v. FabichOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-31· cited 2×
- In re Ubaldo B.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-12-23· cited 2×
- In Re Eric W.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-02-23· cited 1×
- In Re HkNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-02-17
- In Re ArNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-05-11
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-18· cited 79×
- State v. MauroArizona Supreme Court· 1988-12-01· cited 75×
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-07-09· cited 56×
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 52×
- Rineer v. LeonardoArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-24· cited 34×
- In Re JULIO LArizona Supreme Court· 2000-06-01· cited 31×
- In Re Louise C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-10-28· cited 18×
- State v. BrahyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-12-12· cited 15×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-01-10· cited 11×
- State v. BomarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-02-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.