In re Amber S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a rule providing \the court shall determine\ required an express finding (quoting Ariz. R.P. Juv. Ct. 19.1)
• noting the juvenile court “could have simply committed Juvenile to ADJC” after finding she had been unable to comply with “even nominal probation terms”
• affirming the juvenile court's reinstatement of intensive probation and placement of juvenile outside the home upon violation of terms of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re John M.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-12-24· cited 44×
• In Re Niky R.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-10-03· cited 20×
• In Re Nickolas T.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-02-03· cited 8×
• In Re the Welfare of J.S.S.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-05-16· cited 4×