In re J.L.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 850
Syllabus
CHILDREN – PERMANENT CUSTODY – STANDARD OF REVIEW – JUV.R. 40(D) – R.C. 2151.414 – BEST INTEREST: The juvenile court's decision was not against the manifest weight of the evidence when it granted permanent custody to the children services agency where appellant mother had not demonstrated long-term stability and sobriety, as required by her case plan, and the court properly considered all of the best-interest factors under R.C. 2151.414(D). An appellate court does not review a juvenile court's permanent-custody decision for an abuse of discretion rather, the court reviews the decision under a sufficiency-of-the-evidence or manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, based upon the parties' arguments.
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court· 1973-05-30· cited 575×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-04-14· cited 159×
- Cecil v. CottrillOhio Supreme Court· 1993-09-22· cited 38×
- In re K.W.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Highland County· 2018-04-30· cited 37×
- In re M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-19· cited 22×
- In re J.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-03· cited 19×
- In re K.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-13· cited 9×
- In re Z. ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-01· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.