In Re JL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that expert testimony concerning disputed facts and opinions is not a proper subject for judicial notice
• stating that expert testimony concerning disputed facts and opinions is not a proper subject for judicial notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• in the Interest of C.A.N.M., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-09

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Interest of J.F.C.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2002-12-31· cited 4,611×
• In the Interest of J.L.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2005-04-08· cited 1,221×
• Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Garza
  Texas Supreme Court· 2004-12-31· cited 481×
• In the Interest of K.A.F.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2005-04-08· cited 353×
• Johnstone v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 95×
• Sparkman v. Maxwell
  Texas Supreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 91×
• Check v. Mitchell
  Texas Supreme Court· 1988-10-19· cited 83×
• Anderson v. Casebolt
  Texas Supreme Court· 1973-01-17· cited 51×
• MacKie v. McKenzie
  Texas Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 25×
• in the Interest of J.L., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-02-12· cited 7×