Check v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “any change, whether or not material or substantial, made in a judgment while the trial court retains plenary power, operates to delay the commencement of the appellate timetable until the date the modified, corrected or reformed judgment is signed”
• stating that Crown relies on Mullins v. Thomas, 136 Tex. 215, 150 if a judgment is modified, corrected, or reformed in any S.W.2d 83 (1941
• change made in judgment while trial court retains plenary power delays start of appellate timetable until date modified, corrected, or reformed judgment is signed
• “Any change, whether or not material or substantial, made in a judgment while the trial court retains plenary power” will restart the appellate timetable from the date the modified judgment is signed.”
• “[A]ny change, whether or not material or substantial, made in a judgment while the trial court retains plenary power, operates to delay the commencement of the appellate timetable until the date the modified, corrected or reformed judgment is signed.”
• “We hold that any change, whether or not material or substantial, made in a judgment while the trial court retains plenary power, operates to delay the commencement of the appellate timetable until the date the modified, corrected or reformed judgment is signed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).