In re J.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring an observance of due process before a CINC determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re C.T.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2021-10-29
• In re B.H.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2024-07-05

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• In the Interest of B.D.-Y.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-18· cited 492×
• In re Interest of R.S., P.S., and A.S. line
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 253×
• In the Interest of J.D.C.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-08· cited 96×
• In Re the Adoption of A.A.T.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-12· cited 82×
• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 78×
• Winston v. Kansas Dept. of SRS
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-07-19· cited 62×
• In the Interest of J.L.D.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-06-22· cited 32×
• In Re the Adoption of B.J.M.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-06-05· cited 31×
• Sharp v. Sharp
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-01-22· cited 20×
• In re S.M.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1987-06-25· cited 19×
• In the Interest of R.B.S.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-30· cited 7×
• In Re Ah
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-04-02· cited 2×
• Forer v. PEREZ-LAMBKINS
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-09-25· cited 2×