Skip to main content
· 10/24/2014

In re Interest of R.S., P.S., and A.S. line

Citations

  • 50 Kan. App. 2d 1105
  • 336 P.3d 903
  • 2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court considers foreseeable future from child's perspective because children experience time differently than adults.
  • treating foreseeable future finding as part of district court's unfitness findings but applying clear and convincing evidence standard to all conclusions on parental fitness
  • mother's unfitness unlikely to change in the foreseeable future after 10 months had passed and she had made only minimal efforts to regain custody
  • specific factual findings not required for a \best-interests\ determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Standridge, Leben, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.