Skip to main content
N.D. Alabama· 12/19/2012

In re Jefferson County

Citations

  • 484 B.R. 427
  • 2012 WL 6629645
  • 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the absence of limiting language in section 922(a)(1) means the section’s “reach is not limited to just pre-bankruptcy claims”
  • the court concluded after interpreting the statute and reviewing federal case law that § 959(a) applies only if the trustee or receiver is appointed by a federal court
  • “Indeed, a primary determinant for abstaining pursuant to § 1334(c)(1) and the case law abstention doctrines is whether a case presents unsettled or difficult questions of state law.”
  • “All those who attribute Jefferson County’s bankruptcy case ... only to conduct and actions by the County are ill-informed. The State of Alabama and its legislators are a significant, precipitating cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

135 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.