N.D. Alabama· 12/19/2012
In re Jefferson County
Citations
- 484 B.R. 427
- 2012 WL 6629645
- 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the absence of limiting language in section 922(a)(1) means the section’s “reach is not limited to just pre-bankruptcy claims”
- the court concluded after interpreting the statute and reviewing federal case law that § 959(a) applies only if the trustee or receiver is appointed by a federal court
- “Indeed, a primary determinant for abstaining pursuant to § 1334(c)(1) and the case law abstention doctrines is whether a case presents unsettled or difficult questions of state law.”
- “All those who attribute Jefferson County’s bankruptcy case ... only to conduct and actions by the County are ill-informed. The State of Alabama and its legislators are a significant, precipitating cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Jefferson CountyN.D. Alabama· 2013-04-15· cited 12×
- Lex Claims, LLC v. Financial Oversight & Management BoardFirst Circuit· 2017-04-04· cited 8×
- Atiles-Gabriel v. Puerto RicoD. Puerto Rico· 2017-06-23· cited 7×
- Longview Power, LLC v. First American Title Insurance (In re Longview Power, LLC)D. Delaware· 2014-09-11· cited 5×
- Caucus v. AlabamaM.D. Alabama· 2013-08-02· cited 4×
- Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc. v. LTD Farms Partnership (In re Turner Grain Merchandising, Inc.)E.D. Arkansas· 2016-01-19· cited 3×
- In re MitchellD. South Carolina· 2016-02-26· cited 3×
- In re Big Dog II, LLCN.D. Florida· 2019-07-18· cited 3×
- Asset Recovery Group, LLC v. CabreraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-22
Cites
135 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 2,206×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 1,688×
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 1,263×
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 1,044×
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 771×
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininFourth Circuit· 1986-04-10· cited 666×
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualSixth Circuit· 1993-06-17· cited 658×
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 647×
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 419×
- Paul J. Grella, Trustee v. Salem Five Cent Savings BankFirst Circuit· 1994-12-06· cited 349×
- Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court· 1938-01-03· cited 348×
- Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 339×
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)Ninth Circuit· 2011-06-10· cited 288×
- State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama· 1999-05-28· cited 275×
- LeBlanc v. SalemFirst Circuit· 1999-11-02· cited 269×
- Jamie N. Moye v. Clerk, Dekalb County Superior CourtFifth Circuit· 1973-03-09· cited 207×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.