In re J.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court “need only concur with [the trial court’s decision as to] any one subsection [of section 2511(a), in addition to section 2511(b),] in order to affirm the termination of the parties’ parental rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re B.L.W.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-02-12· cited 1,765×
• In re S.M.B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-23· cited 119×
• In re N.C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-30· cited 37×
• In the Interest of K.B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-27· cited 32×
• In re J.I.R.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-17· cited 32×
• In Re NC
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-30· cited 7×
• In re C.G.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-01· cited 6×
• In Re JE
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-27· cited 3×
• In Re JIR
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-17· cited 1×
• In Re CG
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-01
• In Re SMB
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Adoption of Charles EDM, II
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-27· cited 544×
• In the Interest of Lilley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-25· cited 223×
• In Re Child M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-24· cited 107×
• In Re Adoption of Dale A., II
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-11· cited 104×
• In Re the Adoption of B.G.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-17· cited 32×
• In the Interest of Q.J.R.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 9×
• In Re Adoption of L.D.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-06· cited 4×