· 9/11/1996
In Re Adoption of Dale A., II
Citations
- 683 A.2d 297
- 453 Pa. Super. 106
- 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the appellant father’s right to due process was not violated, where he was represented by counsel during the termination hearing, and where his testimony was presented to the court using interrogatories and an affidavit
- rejecting a due process claim where the father provided testimony through interrogatories brought to court by his attorney
- noting “a parent’s responsibilities are not tolled during his incarceration. Instead, a reviewing court must analyze whether the parent utilized those resources available while in prison to maintain a relationship with his child.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Popovich and Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.