Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/4/1983
In Re James D.
Citations
- 455 A.2d 966
- 295 Md. 314
- 1983 Md. LEXIS 204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The term ‘parent’ is commonly understood to mean a father or a mother .... ”
- \The term `parent' is commonly understood to mean a father or a mother. . . .\
- This Court decided “ ‘to construe the statute more narrowly than its literal wording,’ ” in order to avoid a substantial constitutional question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-12· cited 107×
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-19· cited 77×
- Schochet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-09· cited 48×
- Harrison-Solomon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-03-30· cited 44×
- In Re Arnold M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-08· cited 40×
- Taylor v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-11-09· cited 33×
- In Re Ramont K.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-06· cited 23×
- Brown v. Handgun Permit Review BoardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-28· cited 13×
- Pfaff by and Through Stalcup v. IlstrupCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-04-23· cited 8×
- Alavez v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-01-09· cited 8×
- In Re William George T.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-02· cited 6×
- In Re Dan D.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-08· cited 4×
- In Re VICTORIA C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-03-27· cited 4×
- In re: Walker and WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-03-30· cited 4×
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-02· cited 3×
- Simms v. Maryland Dept. of HealthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-02-27· cited 3×
- Simms v. Dept. of HealthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-02-27
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 2,739×
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 833×
- H. L. v. MathesonSupreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 271×
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-07· cited 171×
- Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. CaffieroSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-06-09· cited 69×
- Bowie Inn, Inc. v. City of BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-03-24· cited 59×
- Spence v. GormleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-08-26· cited 57×
- Mahaney v. Hunter Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1967-04-13· cited 50×
- Corley v. LewlessSupreme Court of Georgia· 1971-06-17· cited 46×
- Kelly v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-04-14· cited 37×
- Matter of SorrellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-02-14· cited 35×
- Maryland Board of Pharmacy v. Sav-A-Lot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-10-31· cited 35×
- District Land Corp. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-07-05· cited 31×
- Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-07· cited 26×
- Potomac Insurance Company v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-04-19· cited 24×
- Pickett v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-28· cited 24×
- Vanthournout v. BurgeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-12· cited 15×
- Lanterman v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-07· cited 8×
- Bryan v. KitamuraD. Hawaii· 1982-01-05· cited 7×
- Repko v. SerianiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1965-06-25· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.