Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/17/1971
Corley v. Lewless
Citations
- 182 S.E.2d 766
- 227 Ga. 745
- 1971 Ga. LEXIS 827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statute imposing unlimited liability on parents of delinquent child violates due process
- concluding that statute imposing unlimited liability on parents of delinquent child violates due process
- concluding that statute imposing unlimited liability on parents of delinquent child violates due process
- concluding that statute imposing unlimited liability on parents of delinquent child violates due process
- Other than as provided by statute, “causes of action against the parents of minor tortfeasors are rooted in the common law [of Georgia] and are predicated on something more than the mere parent-child relationship.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. CaffieroSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-06-09· cited 69×
- Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-07-21· cited 61×
- In re D. M.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2006-03-30· cited 41×
- Matter of SorrellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-02-14· cited 35×
- Alber Ex Rel. Alber v. NolleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-05-04· cited 32×
- In Re James D.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-02-04· cited 25×
- Hill v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-10-01· cited 21×
- McNamee v. A. J. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-06-11· cited 20×
- Scarboro v. LaukCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1974-11-19· cited 18×
- Stewart v. HarvardCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-14· cited 17×
- Jackson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-15· cited 16×
- Reeves v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-11-19· cited 15×
- Vanthournout v. BurgeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-12· cited 15×
- Muse v. OzmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-01-08· cited 12×
- Hayward v. RamickSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-01-06· cited 12×
- Dunaway v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1972-11-17· cited 7×
- Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. CaffieroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-04-01· cited 7×
- Bryan v. KitamuraD. Hawaii· 1982-01-05· cited 7×
- Mayer v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-03-04· cited 6×
- Dent v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-09-13· cited 6×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mahaney v. Hunter Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1967-04-13· cited 50×
- Kelly v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-04-14· cited 37×
- Frankel v. ConeSupreme Court of Georgia· 1959-02-06· cited 36×
- Hulsey v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1931-12-21· cited 35×
- Glean v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1967-04-05· cited 26×
- Herrin v. LámarCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1962-05-21· cited 24×
- Faith v. MassengillCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1961-09-06· cited 24×
- Chastain v. JohnsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1904-08-12· cited 24×
- Davis v. GavalasCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1927-09-30· cited 24×
- McBerry v. IvieCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1967-11-22· cited 23×
- Chester v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1967-01-17· cited 15×
- Stanford v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia· 1931-07-25· cited 13×
- Buchanan v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia· 1954-02-09· cited 11×
- Landers v. MedfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1963-10-18· cited 10×
- Bell v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1965-04-30· cited 8×
- Gilbert v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1969-05-13· cited 7×
- Vort v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Georgia· 1965-05-10· cited 6×
- Sagnibene v. State Wholesalers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1968-01-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.