In Re Jacobsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing disciplinary history is an appropriate consideration in imposing sanctions
• recognizing disciplinary history is appropriate consideration in imposing sanction
• “Because Respondent has been found in default and, thus, is deemed to have admitted to all of the factual allegations, the sole question before the Court is whether to accept the Panel’s recommended sanction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Prendergast
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-11-08· cited 7×
• In Re Boney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-11-15· cited 5×
• In the Matter of Nathan Jardine
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-10-29· cited 4×
• In Re Hursey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-12-19· cited 1×
• In the Matter of Joel F. Geer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-03-28
• In re McAdams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-09-14
• In re Lundgren
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-18

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Thompson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-10-30· cited 39×
• In Re Greene
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-12-04· cited 27×
• Matter of Marshall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-23· cited 22×
• In Re Tullis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-10-08· cited 17×
• In Re Murph
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-03· cited 9×
• Matter of Edwards
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-08-15· cited 8×
• Matter of Wofford
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-05-11· cited 7×
• Matter of Meeder
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-04· cited 5×
• In Re Hall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 5×
• In Re Okpalaeke
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-07-23· cited 4×