In Re Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding disbarment was warranted where evidence established that attorney neglected legal matters, practiced law while under suspension, and failed to respond to disciplinary authority
• neglect of legal matters, practicing law while under suspension, and failure to respond to disciplinary authority warranted disbarment
• neglect of legal matters, practicing law while under suspension, and failure to respond to disciplinary authority warranted disbarment
• where Hall was disbarred for practicing law while under indefinite suspension, neglect of legal matters, and failure to respond to disciplinary authority
• neglect of legal matters, practicing law while under suspension, and failure to respond to disciplinary authority warranted disbarment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Murph
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-03· cited 9×
• In Re Jacobsen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-03-01· cited 7×
• In Re Kitchel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-05· cited 4×
• In re Jenkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 2×
• In re Chastain
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-09-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Hall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-30· cited 25×
• In re Hall
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-21· cited 2×