Skip to main content
· 8/3/1972

In re J. N. H.

Citations

  • 293 A.2d 878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]nconclusive results ... may be relevant to show the jury the thoroughness of the steps taken by law enforcement in order to investigate the victim’s account”
  • rejecting a due process challenge to a criminal sentencing hearing held over Zoom due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.