In re I.J.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1191
Syllabus
Parental rights and responsibilities; modification; change in circumstances; R.C. 3109.04(E); best interests; R.C. 3109.051(D); witness list; exhibit list; Guardian ad litem (\GAL\); fees; local rules; abuse of discretion. Judgment affirmed. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by modifying the parties' parental rights and responsibilities agreement and declining to find a change in circumstances. The juvenile court exercised sound discretion when allowing the child's half-brother to testify and allowing certain exhibits from Father even though Mother's witness list and Father's supplemental exhibit list were untimely. Father failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances under R.C. 3109.04(E) to warrant a change in Mother's status as residential parent and legal custodian. Additionally, the modifications by the court to the agreement were in the child's best interest under R.C. 3109.051(D). Lastly, the court did not err when it denied in part Father's motion to exclude the GAL report. The court remedied any error by striking the improper legal conclusions by the GAL regarding change in circumstances and allowed the GAL to testify regarding the child's best interests. The court complied with the local rules by allowing Father 14 days to request a hearing on the GAL's motion for fees prior to ruling on the motion.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Masters v. MastersOhio Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 229×
- Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-25· cited 179×
- Strauss v. StraussOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04· cited 65×
- In re C.O.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-27· cited 22×
- Wallner v. ThorneOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-05-17· cited 22×
- Citibank, N.A. v. KatzOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-21· cited 19×
- Miller v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-17· cited 14×
- In re K.Z.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-28· cited 10×
- In re I.L.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-29· cited 8×
- In re I.L.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-19· cited 8×
- In re I.L.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-25· cited 8×
- Longo v. LongoOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-03· cited 7×
- In re I.A.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-09· cited 5×
- Shaker Hts. ex rel. Friends of Horseshoe Lake, Inc. v. Shaker Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-08· cited 4×
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-27· cited 1×
- In re I.L.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06· cited 1×
- Chrzanowski v. ChrzanowskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.