Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
D. Maryland· 12/12/2016

In re Howes

Citations

  • 563 B.R. 794
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction to issue two orders despite an ongoing appeal of an adversary proceeding not because the orders were technically in different proceedings but because the claims dealt with different issues
  • finding that a bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction to issue two orders despite an ongoing appeal of an adversary proceeding not because the orders were technically in different proceedings but because the claims dealt with different issues
  • finding that a bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction to issue two orders despite an ongoing appeal of an adversary proceeding not because the orders were technically in different proceedings but because the claims dealt with different issues
  • finding that a bankruptcy court retained jurisdiction to issue two orders despite an ongoing appeal of an adversary proceeding not because the orders were technically in different proceedings but because the claims dealt with different issues
  • stating that “where a bankruptcy court uses its equitable authority,” such as in issuing “any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out” the Bankruptcy Code pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105(a
  • applying functional test to conclude that appeal of “adversary proceeding did not divest the Bankruptcy Court of jurisdiction to issue the Escrow Order and the Dismissal Order in the underlying Chapter 13 case’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.