Skip to main content

In Re Horton

Citations

  • 668 N.W.2d 208
  • 2003 Minn. App. LEXIS 1050
  • 2003 WL 22015842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that its code provisions on trusts do “not define ‘interested person’ ”
  • finding that the definition of “interested person” contained in the probate code was inapplicable because the controversy concerned trust assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis, Hudson, Forsberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.