Skip to main content
· 2/19/1987

In Re Hops Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 655 F. Supp. 169
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2522
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the umbrella/supplemental contract analogy was inapplicable in a case in which an arbitration provision was inserted in a later contract
  • contracts separate in time and not interrelated with each other; one that did not contain arbitration clauses did not require arbitration
  • several contracts encompassed discrete transactions between parties and no evidence that later arbitration clause intended to supplement earlier contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hungate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.