· 2/19/1987
In Re Hops Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 655 F. Supp. 169
- 55 U.S.L.W. 2522
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the umbrella/supplemental contract analogy was inapplicable in a case in which an arbitration provision was inserted in a later contract
- contracts separate in time and not interrelated with each other; one that did not contain arbitration clauses did not require arbitration
- several contracts encompassed discrete transactions between parties and no evidence that later arbitration clause intended to supplement earlier contracts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hungate
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.