In re Hoffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if a Ch. 13 debtor is engaged in a business, the debtor’s CMI is income without regard to business expenses, while disposable income is income with regard to business ex-penses
• “when the Code and the Official Forms conflict, the Code controls
• noting conflicts between Code and official forms
• self-employed, type of business not stated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Fields
  E.D. North Carolina· 2015-03-31· cited 6×
• In re Harris
  E.D. North Carolina· 2014-12-24· cited 5×
• In re Reinhart
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2016-09-30

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 1,290×
• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• Drummond v. Wiegand (In Re Wiegand)
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 29×
• In Re Arnold
  M.D. Tennessee· 2007-07-03· cited 18×
• In re Harkins
  S.D. Ohio· 2013-05-01· cited 11×
• In Re Sharp
  C.D. Illinois· 2008-08-21· cited 9×
• Harman v. Fink (In Re Harman)
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-09-03· cited 5×
• In re Compann
  N.D. Georgia· 2010-09-30· cited 5×