· 9/3/2010
Harman v. Fink (In Re Harman)
Citations
- 435 B.R. 596
- 2010 WL 3447772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is ultimately the statute, not the form which determines the applicable commitment period”
- “Kit is ultimately the statute, not the form, which determines the applicable commitment period.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kressel, Schermer, Mahoney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.