In re Hock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To apply the principal-residence-only bright line approach, the [c]ourt would have to unilaterally add the word ‘only’ or ‘exclusively’ to the text of [section] 1123(b)(5) . . . .”
• “Stated differently, the claims which may not be modified in a chapter 11 plan are claims secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's principal residence.”
• interpreting identical language under § 1123(b)(5)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Lister
  S.D. Ohio· 2018-09-25· cited 3×
• Patricia Lee v. U.S. Bank National Association
  Eleventh Circuit· 2024-05-23· cited 3×
• In re Breland
  S.D. Alabama· 2018-03-15

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connecticut National Bank v. Germain
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
• Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 2,720×
• Randall v. Loftsgaarden
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 320×
• In Re Frances Scarborough, Frances Scarborough v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
  Third Circuit· 2006-08-28· cited 66×
• Medical Transportation Management Corp. v. Commissioner
  Eleventh Circuit· 2007-11-09· cited 34×
• United States v. Aldrich
  Eleventh Circuit· 2009-04-27· cited 28×
• In Re MacAluso
  W.D. New York· 2000-11-02· cited 23×
• Wages v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re Wages)
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-03-07· cited 15×
• In Re Kaplan
  S.D. Florida· 2005-10-06· cited 14×
• In re Schayes
  D. Arizona· 2012-12-04· cited 13×
• In Re Zaldivar
  S.D. Florida· 2011-01-25· cited 10×
• In re Wages
  D. Idaho· 2012-07-24· cited 10×
• In re Addams
  E.D. New York· 2017-03-09· cited 8×
• In re Brooks
  W.D. New York· 2016-04-15· cited 5×