Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/27/2026
In re Hirt
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 681
Syllabus
Sulek, J., affirming trial court's judgment. Discovery limitations were within trial court's discretion. Search warrant was not defective, but even if it were, the good faith exception to exclusionary rule applies. R.C. 959.132 hearing did not result in a due process violation and bond imposed did not constitute an excessive in personam criminal penalty.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 1,395×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganSixth Circuit· 2015-09-08· cited 335×
- State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court· 1973-04-25· cited 269×
- Ferguson v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-09-28· cited 35×
- 12312 Mayfield Rd., L.L.C. v. High & Low Little Italy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-18· cited 7×
- In re Estate of OhmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-03· cited 4×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-25· cited 3×
- Warman v. LivaNova DeutschlandOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.