In Re Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim concerning adequacy of testimony sought at hearing that has not yet been convened is not ripe
• “The normal mode of judicial review in Vermont is by appeal after judgment.”
• \The normal mode of judicial review in Vermont is by appeal after judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re J.G.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-05-21· cited 33×
• In Re Appeal of Application for Search Warrant
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-14· cited 26×
• In Re Vermont Electric Power Producers, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-07-12· cited 13×
• Hill v. Wheel
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-15· cited 1×
• In Re JG
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-05-21
• In re Hill
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCartney v. Commission on Judicial Qualifications
  California Supreme Court· 1974-09-19· cited 121×
• Matter of Bates
  Texas Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 46×
• Castle v. SHERBURNE CORPORATION
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-04-06· cited 37×
• Moore v. Turner
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1952-06-23· cited 33×
• In Re Markle
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-12-21· cited 26×
• McKenney v. Commission on Judicial Conduct
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-03-28· cited 16×
• Gay Brothers Fuel Service v. Travelers Indem. Co.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-02-04· cited 3×