S.D. California· 11/29/2010
In Re Hill
Citations
- 440 B.R. 176
- 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 4184
- 2010 WL 4873054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting Chapter 20 lien stripping but requiring plan that “otherwise complies with the requirements of the Code”
- applying the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Zimmer, and concluding that a lien that is unsecured under Sections 506(a) and 1322(b) must also be unsecured under Section 1325(a)
- chapter 20 lien strips are permitted absent discharge so long as plan otherwise complies with Code requirements
- “Since the ... debt was already discharged, or changed to non-recourse status in the Chapter 7 case, a second discharge for the Debtors in this Chapter 13 case would be redundant.”
- chapter 20 lien strips are 19 permitted absent discharge so long as plan otherwise complies with 20 Code requirements
- “Section 1325(a)(5) has no applicability to unsecured claims. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Margaret M. Mann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n v. Blendheim (In Re Blendheim)Ninth Circuit· 2015-10-01· cited 85×
- Fisette v. Keller (In Re Fisette)Eighth Circuit· 2011-08-29· cited 48×
- In Re OkosisiD. Nevada· 2011-05-16· cited 47×
- In Re GerardinS.D. Florida· 2011-03-28· cited 30×
- Meyer v. Lepe (In Re Lepe)Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-09· cited 25×
- In Re JenningsN.D. Georgia· 2011-07-11· cited 24×
- In Re FairE.D. Wisconsin· 2011-04-19· cited 21×
- In Re VictorioS.D. California· 2011-07-08· cited 20×
- Frazier v. REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC.E.D. California· 2012-03-09· cited 18×
- Bronitsky v. Bea (In Re Bea)Ninth Circuit· 2015-05-29· cited 18×
- VICTORIO v. BillingsleaS.D. California· 2012-02-24· cited 14×
- In Re Scotto-DiclementeD. New Jersey· 2011-11-18· cited 14×
- In re ScantlingM.D. Florida· 2012-02-24· cited 14×
- Lindskog v. M & I Bank FSB (In Re Lindskog)E.D. Wisconsin· 2011-04-13· cited 10×
- In re: Serge Michel Boukatch and Lori Jean BoukatchNinth Circuit· 2015-07-09· cited 10×
- In re RosaN.D. California· 2014-12-10· cited 10×
- Davis v. TD Bank, N.A. (In Re Davis)D. Maryland· 2011-03-30· cited 9×
- Williams v. Marshall (In re Williams )N.D. Illinois· 2013-03-13· cited 9×
- In re SadowskiD. Connecticut· 2011-09-30· cited 8×
- In re SandrinD. Colorado· 2015-08-28· cited 8×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 1,364×
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 1,263×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekThird Circuit· 1989-10-12· cited 273×
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeNinth Circuit· 1982-05-03· cited 259×
- In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1987-07-06· cited 174×
- In Re Khalil and Shahin Chinichian, Debtors. Khalil and Shahin Chinichian v. Attilio CampolongoNinth Circuit· 1986-03-19· cited 151×
- In Re Sieglinde M. Zimmer, Debtor, Sieglinde M. Zimmer v. Psb Lending CorporationNinth Circuit· 2002-12-24· cited 124×
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)Ninth Circuit· 1988-08-16· cited 106×
- Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam)Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-03· cited 90×
- In Re William Andrews Elana Andrews, Debtors. William Andrews Elana Andrews v. Lawrence J. Loheit, Chapter 13 TrusteeNinth Circuit· 1995-03-08· cited 67×
- In Re JarvisC.D. Illinois· 2008-07-09· cited 44×
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Zamora (In Re Silverman)Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-12· cited 43×
- In Re TranN.D. California· 2010-06-25· cited 41×
- Smith v. Rojas (In Re Smith)Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-08· cited 39×
- In Re LillyC.D. Illinois· 2007-10-30· cited 32×
- In Re FennN.D. Illinois· 2010-05-17· cited 31×
- United States Internal Revenue Service, Creditor-Appellee v. Donald Snyder, Debtor-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2003-09-15· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.