Skip to main content
N.D. California· 4/18/2012

In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 856 F. Supp. 2d 1103
  • 2012 WL 1353057

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even though bilateral “do not cold call” agreements covered just six of twenty-one possible pairings between the defendants, the plaintiffs had sufficiently pled facts alleging a plausible anticompetitive conspiracy
  • stating that federal jurisdiction exists in federal enclave cases \when the locus in which the claim arose is the federal enclave itself\
  • noting that it “strain[ed] credulity” that alleged conduct occurred absent unlawful coordination
  • determining that plaintiff had alleged \a per se violation of the Sherman Act for purposes of surviving a 12(b)(6) motion\ but that the ultimate decision of which test applies \is more appropriate on a motion for summary judgment\
  • noting that it “strain[ed] credulity” that alleged conduct occurred absent unlawful coordination
  • “whether per se or rule of reason analysis applies...is more appropriate on a motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.