N.D. California· 4/18/2012
In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 856 F. Supp. 2d 1103
- 2012 WL 1353057
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even though bilateral “do not cold call” agreements covered just six of twenty-one possible pairings between the defendants, the plaintiffs had sufficiently pled facts alleging a plausible anticompetitive conspiracy
- stating that federal jurisdiction exists in federal enclave cases \when the locus in which the claim arose is the federal enclave itself\
- noting that it “strain[ed] credulity” that alleged conduct occurred absent unlawful coordination
- determining that plaintiff had alleged \a per se violation of the Sherman Act for purposes of surviving a 12(b)(6) motion\ but that the ultimate decision of which test applies \is more appropriate on a motion for summary judgment\
- noting that it “strain[ed] credulity” that alleged conduct occurred absent unlawful coordination
- “whether per se or rule of reason analysis applies...is more appropriate on a motion for summary judgment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Name.Space, Inc. v. Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & NumbersNinth Circuit· 2015-07-31· cited 53×
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.E.D. New York· 2016-02-24· cited 39×
- Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)E.D. Illinois· 2018-05-14· cited 37×
- Garrison v. Oracle Corp.N.D. California· 2016-02-02· cited 21×
- Cnty. of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.N.D. California· 2018-03-16· cited 21×
- Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-06-05· cited 20×
- Ryan v. Microsoft Corp.N.D. California· 2015-11-23· cited 20×
- Nitsch v. DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc.N.D. California· 2016-05-25· cited 17×
- In re Animation Workers Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2015-08-20· cited 15×
- In re Animation Workers Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2015-04-03· cited 13×
- In re London Silver Fixing, Ltd., Antitrust Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2018-07-25· cited 11×
- International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Verso Paper Corp.D. Maine· 2015-01-20· cited 7×
- Orchard Supply Hardware LLC v. Home Depot USA, Inc.N.D. California· 2013-04-12· cited 7×
- Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2013-03-13· cited 5×
- Riva v. Pepsico, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-03-04· cited 4×
- Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc.N.D. California· 2015-04-24· cited 3×
- Greencycle Paint, Inc. v. Paintcare, Inc.N.D. California· 2017-04-11· cited 2×
- Jain Irrigation, Inc. v. Netafim Irrigation, Inc.E.D. California· 2019-05-13· cited 2×
- name.space v. IcannNinth Circuit· 2015-07-31
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
- Navarro v. BlockNinth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 2,226×
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2008-03-25· cited 1,798×
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 1,149×
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-02-12· cited 1,065×
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 1,058×
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerNinth Circuit· 1992-07-07· cited 1,018×
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 924×
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-04-25· cited 898×
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-05· cited 757×
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1997-05-23· cited 672×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 614×
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionNinth Circuit· 2008-01-23· cited 569×
- Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 523×
Other cases named In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.