In Re Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that federal patent law requires consent to assignment by the li-censor whether the license is exclusive or nonexclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Superbrace, Inc. v. Tidwell
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-11-23· cited 4×
• In Re Aerobox Composite Structures, LLC
  D. New Mexico· 2007-07-27· cited 2×
• Proteotech, Inc. v. Unicity International, Inc.
  W.D. Washington· 2008-03-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Waterman v. MacKenzie
  Supreme Court· 1891-02-02· cited 598×
• In Re James Cable Partners, L.P., Debtor. The City of Jamestown, Tennessee v. James Cable Partners, L.P.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-08-03· cited 57×
• Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1892-04-04· cited 53×
• In Re Thomas E. Magness Harry E. Redman, Debtors. John Paul Rieser, Trustee v. The Dayton Country Club Company and Cynthia Magness Karas
  Sixth Circuit· 1992-08-17· cited 36×
• Sanofi, S.A. v. Med-Tech Veterinarian Products, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1983-06-15· cited 22×
• Philadelphia Brief Case Co. v. Specialty Leather Products Co.
  D. New Jersey· 1956-10-26· cited 18×
• Walter H. Etherington v. S. M. Hardee, D/B/A Hardee Tool Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1961-05-04· cited 16×
• Murray v. Franke-Misal Technologies Group, LLC (In Re Supernatural Foods, LLC)
  M.D. Louisiana· 2001-10-17· cited 9×
• Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.
  E.D. Texas· 1992-07-24· cited 9×