E.D. Texas· 7/24/1992
Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.
Citations
- 803 F. Supp. 1200
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15009
- 1992 WL 250516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that because Intel licensee, ST sold the finished products it manufactured for Cyrix to Cyrix, Intel’s rights with respect to Cyrix are exhausted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul N. Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Positive Software v. New Century MortgageFifth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 41×
- Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2006-02-06· cited 34×
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.E.D. Texas· 1994-01-21· cited 13×
- Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp.N.D. Texas· 2004-09-28· cited 10×
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Angeion Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-08-15· cited 9×
- Murray v. Franke-Misal Technologies Group, LLC (In Re Supernatural Foods, LLC)M.D. Louisiana· 2001-10-17· cited 9×
- Intel Corp. v. Broadcom Corp.D. Delaware· 2001-11-20· cited 8×
- In Re HernandezD. Arizona· 2002-09-09· cited 4×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court· 1942-05-11· cited 305×
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-08-21· cited 253×
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court· 1942-05-11· cited 227×
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1991-09-13· cited 212×
- Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court· 1853-03-18· cited 148×
- Bernard v. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co.Supreme Court· 1988-01-25· cited 139×
- Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-10-16· cited 116×
- Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1974-01-10· cited 116×
- Pellaton v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-05-13· cited 107×
- Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1974-02-07· cited 100×
- Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-15· cited 98×
- Waggoner v. LasterSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-10-15· cited 87×
- Wilson v. American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware· 1965-04-21· cited 77×
- Klair v. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-09-16· cited 53×
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1943-05-05· cited 49×
- George v. Frank A. Robino, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1975-02-21· cited 29×
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MadricSupreme Court of Delaware· 1962-06-19· cited 21×
- Lee Roy Guidry v. Continental Oil CompanyFifth Circuit· 1965-08-17· cited 19×
- Wolf v. Globe Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1954-03-25· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.