In Re Henry
Citations
- 123 U.S. 372
- 8 S. Ct. 142
- 31 L. Ed. 174
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2181
Syllabus
<p>ORIGINAL.</p> <p>Each letter or packet put in or taken out from the post-office of the United ■ States iii violation of the provisions of llcv. Stat. § 5180 constitutes a separate and distinct violation of tlip act.</p> <p>Three separate offences (but not more) against the provisions of Rev. Stat. § 5180, when committed within the same six calendar months, may be joined, and when so joined there is to be a single sentence for all; bat this does not prevent other indictments, for other and distinct of-fences under the same statute committed within the same six- calendar months.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- each letter placed with or taken from post office with purpose of devising scheme or artifice to defraud constitutes separate offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- United States v. Robert Craig, Frank P. North, Jr., Peter v. Pappas and Jack E. WalkerSeventh Circuit· 1978-03-21· cited 119×
- Chadwick v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1905-11-17· cited 107×
- United States v. Marcos L. Anderson, A/K/A Marcos Loinas AndersonD.C. Circuit· 1995-07-18· cited 98×
- Cochran v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1930-05-05· cited 79×
- Howard v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1896-07-08· cited 64×
- Freeman v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1915-08-25· cited 59×
- United States v. Van AllenS.D. New York· 1961-06-27· cited 57×
- Alton T. Milam, Burr F. Sprague and Robert B. Kimball v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-10-14· cited 49×
- Ex parte LamarSecond Circuit· 1921-04-02· cited 45×
- Brown v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1906-01-19· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. Colonial Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1961-09-22· cited 41×
- In Re De BaraSupreme Court· 1900-12-03· cited 36×
- Neely v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1924-11-06· cited 36×
- Spirou v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1928-03-12· cited 35×
- Levine v. HudspethTenth Circuit· 1942-05-01· cited 27×
- Holdsworth v. United States (Two Cases)First Circuit· 1950-04-13· cited 26×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-31· cited 26×
- United States v. GreenhausSecond Circuit· 1936-08-03· cited 25×
- B.J. Burleson v. James Saffle, and Drew EdmondsonTenth Circuit· 2002-01-24· cited 23×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.