In Re Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• debtor’s proposal to retain non-exempt property would prevent confirmation unless debtor submits sufficient new value to match or exceed the value of the non-exempt property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Shat
  D. Nevada· 2010-02-22· cited 34×
• In Re Bullard
  D. Connecticut· 2007-01-16· cited 15×
• In re Martin
  M.D. Florida· 2013-09-17· cited 8×
• In re Gerard
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2013-08-07· cited 5×
• In re Brown
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-09-26· cited 5×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz
  Supreme Court· 1992-04-21· cited 949×
• Toibb v. Radloff
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 500×
• Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership
  Supreme Court· 1999-05-03· cited 353×
• Matter of Yasparro
  M.D. Florida· 1989-05-04· cited 41×
• In Re Gosman
  S.D. Florida· 2002-07-30· cited 17×
• State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Elmwood, Inc. (In Re Elmwood, Inc.)
  D. Nevada· 1995-05-30· cited 16×
• United States v. Wabash Valley Power Ass'n
  Supreme Court· 1996-11-04· cited 16×
• In Re Johnson
  M.D. Florida· 1989-05-09· cited 11×
• In Re Egan
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-07-27· cited 10×
• In Re General Teamsters, Warehousemen And Helpers Union, Local 890, Dba Teamsters Local 890, An Unincorporated Association
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-10· cited 9×
• In Re Shin
  District of Columbia· 2004-02-13· cited 5×