In Re Haralambous

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overruling objection to reopening bankruptcy case because reopening of bankruptcy case is only a “ministerial or mechanical act which allows the court file to be retrieved.”
• overruling objection to reopening bankruptcy case because reopening of bankruptcy case is only a “ministerial or mechanical act which allows the court file to be retrieved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Hamlett
  M.D. North Carolina· 2003-07-07· cited 13×
• In Re Boyer
  D. Connecticut· 2006-11-20· cited 12×
• Cadle Co. ex rel. D.A.N. Joint Venture, L.P. v. Andersen (Andersen)
  First Circuit· 2012-08-17· cited 12×
• In Re Kuhn
  N.D. Indiana· 2005-03-23· cited 11×
• In Re Balonze
  D. Connecticut· 2006-01-13· cited 10×
• In re Wright
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-04-17· cited 6×
• In re Larson
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-08-30· cited 1×
• In re: Wayne Wright
  Sixth Circuit· 2017-04-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jeffrey and Jeffrey v. Desmond
  First Circuit· 1995-11-22· cited 166×
• Ed Vreugdenhill, D/B/A Menning Implement v. Navistar International Transportation Corporation, Formerly International Harvester Company
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-11-29· cited 96×
• Cundiff v. Cundiff (In Re Cundiff)
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-12-21· cited 44×
• United States v. Germaine (In Re Germaine)
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-03-31· cited 40×
• Tavormina v. Harris (In Re Harris)
  S.D. Florida· 1983-07-18· cited 28×
• Kinder v. Scharff
  Supreme Court· 1913-12-15· cited 26×
• In Re Suplinskas
  D. Connecticut· 2000-08-17· cited 8×
• In re Rosen
  S.D. New York· 1936-03-19· cited 3×