Skip to main content
· 11/22/1995

Jeffrey and Jeffrey v. Desmond

Citations

  • 70 F.3d 183
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32700
  • 1995 WL 683479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there is “no such concept as ‘assumed abandonment’ ”
  • acknowledging other arguments and announcing none had merit without explaining the reasoning therefor
  • listing “the paramount interest of the creditors” as one of four factors
  • “any asset not properly scheduled remains property of the bankrupt estate, and the debtor loses all rights to enforce it in his own name”
  • citation Jeffrey v. Desmond, 70 F.3d 183, 185 (1st Cir. 1995) (citation _______ omitted). It may consider, among other factors: (1) the omitted
  • “any asset not properly scheduled remains property of the bankrupt estate, and the debtor loses all rights to enforce it in his own name”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Stearns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.