· 11/22/1995
Jeffrey and Jeffrey v. Desmond
Citations
- 70 F.3d 183
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32700
- 1995 WL 683479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that there is “no such concept as ‘assumed abandonment’ ”
- acknowledging other arguments and announcing none had merit without explaining the reasoning therefor
- listing “the paramount interest of the creditors” as one of four factors
- “any asset not properly scheduled remains property of the bankrupt estate, and the debtor loses all rights to enforce it in his own name”
- citation Jeffrey v. Desmond, 70 F.3d 183, 185 (1st Cir. 1995) (citation _______ omitted). It may consider, among other factors: (1) the omitted
- “any asset not properly scheduled remains property of the bankrupt estate, and the debtor loses all rights to enforce it in his own name”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Stearns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.