M.D. Tennessee· 5/16/2013
In re Hamilton
Citations
- 493 B.R. 31
- 2013 WL 2151457
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focusing on § 349(b) as the basis for the policy of returning debtors to their pre-petition status quo ante
- comparing cases disposing of plan payments held by the chapter 13 trustee pre- and post-confirmation at 34 nn.4-5, in the course of determining disposition of funds held by the chapter 13 trustee upon post-confirmation dismissal
- “At dismissal after confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan, § 349(b)(3) controls and undistributed funds held by the trustee must be returned to the debtor.”’
- “Section 349(b)(3) is not ambiguous: At dismissal — unless the court, for cause, orders otherwise — all postpetition earnings of the debtor vest in the debtor.”
- “Without regard to the immaturity of the debtor’s interest in future wages that have not been earned, the Bankruptcy Code includes those future earnings in property of the Chapter 13 estate.”
- “Creditors may have statutory or equitable arguments for a share of the undistributed pie.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lundin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jeffrey P. White & Associates, P.C. v. Fessenden (Wheaton)First Circuit· 2016-04-14· cited 32×
- Williams v. MarshallN.D. Illinois· 2014-04-11· cited 12×
- In re EdwardsS.D. Illinois· 2015-09-22· cited 10×
- In re BatesonE.D. Michigan· 2016-06-23· cited 10×
- In re HirschW.D. Michigan· 2016-05-13· cited 8×
- In re DemeryW.D. Louisiana· 2017-03-31· cited 5×
- In re HaddadE.D. Michigan· 2017-09-06· cited 5×
- In re JankauskasN.D. Georgia· 2018-10-25· cited 4×
- Viegelahn v. LopezW.D. Texas· 2017-03-07· cited 3×
- In re GonzalesW.D. Michigan· 2017-12-18· cited 3×
- In re ElmsS.D. Ohio· 2019-07-16· cited 3×
- Terry Revell v. Morrison Supply Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-08-29· cited 2×
- In re ClementsE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-06-28· cited 2×
- In re WardE.D. Wisconsin· 2014-06-26· cited 2×
- In re HooksM.D. Alabama· 2017-10-30· cited 2×
- In re BeairdD. Kansas· 2017-09-11· cited 2×
- In re DuboseM.D. Alabama· 2016-08-02· cited 1×
- Rick Warren v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 2021-04-27
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re John R. Kolstad, Debtor. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) v. John R. KolstadFifth Circuit· 1991-04-10· cited 117×
- In Re: Barry L. Michael v.Third Circuit· 2012-10-26· cited 74×
- In Re BobroffThird Circuit· 1985-07-05· cited 66×
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Oparaji (In Re Oparaji)Fifth Circuit· 2012-10-05· cited 57×
- In Re LennonN.D. Georgia· 1986-09-05· cited 50×
- Morton v. Morton (In Re Morton)Sixth Circuit· 2003-09-12· cited 49×
- Hannan v. Kirschenbaum (In Re Hannan)E.D. New York· 1982-11-03· cited 41×
- Waugh v. Saldamarco (In Re Waugh)W.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-02-01· cited 32×
- In Re Juan O. Plata, in Re Catalina Plata, Debtors. Peter H. Arkison, Trustee v. Juan O. Plata, Catalina PlataNinth Circuit· 1992-03-10· cited 25×
- Massachusetts v. Pappalardo (In Re Steenstra)First Circuit· 2004-03-31· cited 25×
- In Re ParrishDistrict of Columbia· 2002-03-04· cited 24×
- Williams v. IMC Mortgage Co. (In Re Williams)Eighth Circuit· 1999-12-27· cited 22×
- In Re BoggsW.D. Washington· 1992-02-24· cited 21×
- In Re DoyleE.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-05-22· cited 21×
- In Re LewisE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-07-24· cited 20×
- Iannini v. WinnecourW.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-11-30· cited 20×
- In Re SanitateE.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-03-31· cited 19×
- In Re WalterC.D. Illinois· 1996-07-29· cited 19×
- In Re SlaughterN.D. Illinois· 1992-04-28· cited 19×
- In Re OliverE.D. Virginia· 1998-05-13· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.