In re Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The majority’s position that post-petition wages must be returned to debtors upon dismissal is supported by § 349(b)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jeffrey P. White & Associates, P.C. v. Fessenden (Wheaton)
  First Circuit· 2016-04-14· cited 32×
• Viegelahn v. Lopez (In Re Lopez)
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-07-31· cited 29×
• In re Demery
  W.D. Louisiana· 2017-03-31· cited 5×
• In re Gonzales
  W.D. Michigan· 2017-12-18· cited 3×
• Terry Revell v. Morrison Supply Company, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-08-29· cited 2×
• In re Hooks
  M.D. Alabama· 2017-10-30· cited 2×
• In re Dubose
  M.D. Alabama· 2016-08-02· cited 1×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. Viegelahn
  Supreme Court· 2015-05-18· cited 183×
• In Re: Barry L. Michael v.
  Third Circuit· 2012-10-26· cited 74×
• Branigan v. Bateman
  Fourth Circuit· 2008-02-04· cited 51×
• In Re Parrish
  District of Columbia· 2002-03-04· cited 24×
• In re Hamilton
  M.D. Tennessee· 2013-05-16· cited 22×
• In Re Sanitate
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-03-31· cited 19×
• In Re Slaughter
  N.D. Illinois· 1992-04-28· cited 19×
• In re Darden
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-05-25· cited 19×
• In Re Parker
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-01-21· cited 12×
• Williams v. Marshall
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-04-11· cited 12×
• Mary Viegelahn v. Charles Harris, III
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-07-07· cited 9×
• In re Beauregard
  D. New Mexico· 2015-07-10· cited 8×
• Viegelahn v. Harris (In re Harris)
  W.D. Texas· 2013-03-22· cited 4×