In Re Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Until the Chapter 13 plan proposes treatment of the secured portion of the Internal Revenue Service claim, it cannot be considered for confirmation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Whitelock
  D. Utah· 1990-12-26· cited 20×
• In re Engen
  D. Kansas· 2016-12-13· cited 12×
• Internal Revenue Service v. Stewart (In Re Stewart)
  W.D. Virginia· 1994-08-16· cited 5×
• In Re Beauchamp
  D. Minnesota· 2002-09-17· cited 3×
• In re Russell
  S.D. Ohio· 2013-12-31· cited 2×
• In re Santana
  D. Puerto Rico· 2012-10-18· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Lawson
  N.D. Illinois· 1988-12-05· cited 52×
• In Re Perkins
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1985-07-15· cited 25×
• Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. Cook (In Re Cook)
  D. New Mexico· 1982-12-22· cited 20×