In re Haller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]f there is no novelty in an article or composition, then a patent cannot be properly granted on the article or composition, regardless of the use for which it is intended”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Application of Benner
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1949-04-12· cited 16×
• Application of Shackell
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1952-02-18· cited 12×
• ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2009-05-14· cited 8×
• In re Waite
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1948-05-04· cited 6×
• In Re Jones
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1947-06-17· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Thuau
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1943-04-05· cited 39×
• Ajax Metal Co. v. Brady Brass Co.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey· 1907-07-31· cited 14×
• In re Greider
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1942-06-01· cited 11×
• In re Migrdichian
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1946-06-27· cited 3×
• In re Hansen
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1946-04-01· cited 2×