Customs and Patent Appeals· 4/12/1949
Application of Benner
Citations
- 174 F.2d 938
- 36 C.C.P.A. 1081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “no provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product”
- \no provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product\
- “no provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product”
- “[N]o provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product.”
- “no provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product”
- “[N]o provision has been made in the patent statutes for granting a patent upon an old product based solely upon discovery of a new use for such product.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrett, Hatfield, Jackson, O'Connell, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re SchreiberFederal Circuit· 1997-12-17· cited 128×
- Application of HenzeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1950-04-03· cited 35×
- In re HackCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1957-06-04· cited 19×
- Abbott Laboratories and Central Glass Company, Ltd. v. Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. And Baxter Healthcare Corp., Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2007-01-16· cited 16×
- In Re James F. Crish and Richard L. Eckert (Serial No. 08/822,509)Federal Circuit· 2004-12-21· cited 14×
- Application of ShackellCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1952-02-18· cited 12×
- Application of CraigeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1951-06-26· cited 11×
- Schering Corp. v. Precision-Cosmet Co., Inc.D. Delaware· 1985-07-02· cited 9×
- Application of RishoiCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1952-05-28· cited 6×
- Matter of the Application of Walter L. HackCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1957-06-04· cited 5×
- Pennsylvania Crusher Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1951-02-09· cited 2×
- Abbott Laboratories v. Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-11-09· cited 1×
- In Re CrishFederal Circuit· 2004-12-21
- Application of AronbergCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1952-09-30
- Innovatit Seafood Systems, LLC v. Commissioner for PatentsDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-29
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re ThuauCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1943-04-05· cited 39×
- Old Town Ribbon & Carbon Co. v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Second Circuit· 1947-01-06· cited 38×
- Hall v. ShimadzuCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1932-06-20· cited 14×
- Braren v. HornerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-02-25· cited 12×
- In Re CooperCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1943-03-01· cited 9×
- In re HallerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1947-04-22· cited 6×
- Lawson v. DavisCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1942-07-06· cited 6×
- In re DaweCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-11-27· cited 5×
- In re BeplateCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1935-05-27· cited 4×
- Deutsch v. BallCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1935-06-10· cited 4×
- In re WolfeCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1934-03-26· cited 3×
- In re MasonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1938-02-07· cited 3×
- In re DenseCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1946-06-11· cited 2×
- In re AbrahamsenCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1932-04-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.