In Re Greer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ As a practical matter, unless there are changes which can be clearly foreseen, the court must simply multiply the debtor’s current monthly income by thirty-six’ ” (quoting 5 Collier ¶ 1325.08[4][a] (15th ed. 1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• In Re Royal
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-11-07· cited 17×
• In Re DeThample
  D. Kansas· 2008-07-24· cited 16×
• In Re Sharp
  C.D. Illinois· 2008-08-21· cited 9×
• In Re Minahan
  W.D. Virginia· 2008-08-20· cited 7×
• In Re Almonte
  E.D. New York· 2008-12-09· cited 6×
• In Re Hilton
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-10-15· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 189×
• In Re Jass
  D. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
• Kibbe v. Sumski
  First Circuit· 2007-02-20· cited 103×
• Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 55×
• In Re Hanks
  D. Utah· 2007-01-09· cited 49×
• Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-07· cited 44×
• In Re Ellringer
  D. Minnesota· 2007-06-20· cited 20×
• Mancl v. Chatterton (In Re Mancl)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2008-02-12· cited 19×
• Maney v. Kagenveama
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 14×