In Re GOOGLE LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it is “a clear abuse of discretion to accord this factor any weight” where the plaintiff “is not engaged in product competition in the marketplace”
• holding it is “a clear abuse of discretion to accord this factor any weight” where the plaintiff “is not engaged in product competition in the marketplace”
• noting the patented technology was invented in, and the patents prosecuted from, the transferee district and the accused products were developed in that district
• weighing location of prosecuting attorneys in favor of transfer
• weighing location of inventors in favor of transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-10-10· cited 1,830×
• In Re TS Tech USA Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-12-29· cited 352×
• In Re Genentech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 337×
• In Re Vistaprint Limited
  Federal Circuit· 2010-12-15· cited 189×
• Defense Distributed v. Bruck
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-04-01· cited 172×
• In re Planned Parenthood Federation of America
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-10-31· cited 91×
• In Re Verizon Business Network Services Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-03-23· cited 14×