S.D. New York· 3/23/2004
In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 322 F. Supp. 2d 319
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5040
- 2004 WL 763890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiffs stated Section 20(a) claim against the defendant because they alleged specific scenarios showing “actual control and culpable participation” by the defendant
- holding that those who masterminded sham transactions or other deceptive practices are primary violators
- noting that control person analysis is a “decidedly fact-based determination”
- finding an inference of motive where an auditor received consulting fees nearly six times greater than its auditing fees
- finding liability where plaintiffs alleged that auditors “prepared, directed or controlled,” “helped created,” and “materially assisted” the preparation of a direct violator’s false statements
- denying motion to dismiss scheme claim where it was alleged that defendant “masterminded” sham swap transactions used to circumvent GAAP and inflate revenues
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-04-30· cited 154×
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-12-22· cited 150×
- Regents of the University of California v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-03-19· cited 125×
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCS.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 110×
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-06-28· cited 107×
- In Re Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 103×
- In Re Take-Two Interactive Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2008-04-16· cited 91×
- In Re BISYS Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-10-28· cited 83×
- Pacific Investment Management Co. v. Mayer Brown LLPSecond Circuit· 2010-04-27· cited 72×
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesS.D. Texas· 2008-09-08· cited 66×
- In Re Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2010-04-29· cited 65×
- City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Energysolutions, Inc.S.D. New York· 2011-09-30· cited 65×
- In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2004-12-15· cited 62×
- Lapin v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 2006-09-29· cited 61×
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesS.D. Texas· 2006-06-05· cited 55×
- Simpson v. Aol Time Warner Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2006-06-30· cited 54×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KPMG LLPS.D. New York· 2006-01-13· cited 54×
- Menaldi v. Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLCS.D. New York· 2016-02-17· cited 54×
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationD. Maryland· 2004-12-21· cited 48×
- In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationD. Maryland· 2005-08-25· cited 47×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffThird Circuit· 1997-06-10· cited 4,496×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 1,450×
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 1,243×
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanFirst Circuit· 1996-12-10· cited 896×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court· 1963-12-09· cited 780×
- Rothman v. GregorSecond Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 778×
- Kramer v. Time Warner IncSecond Circuit· 1991-06-27· cited 603×
- Novak v. KasaksSecond Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 579×
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittSecond Circuit· 1996-03-25· cited 568×
- In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities LitigationSecond Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 541×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPSecond Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 447×
- Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial HospitalSupreme Court· 1995-03-06· cited 432×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ZandfordSupreme Court· 2002-06-03· cited 406×
- In Re: Scholastic Corporation Securities LitigationSecond Circuit· 2001-06-01· cited 332×
- Ilya Boguslavsky v. Martin H. Kaplan and Gusrae, Kaplan & Bruno, Paul T. RussoSecond Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 253×
Other cases named In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities Litigation
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2003-12-22· cited 83×
- In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2006-06-13· cited 8×
- In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2003-03-24· cited 1×
- In Re Global Crossing Ltd. Securities LitigationJudicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation· 2004-10-22
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.