S.D. New York· 7/24/2003
In Re Global Crossing Ltd.
Citations
- 295 B.R. 726
- 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 900
- 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 834
- 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 169
- 2003 WL 21728842
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the standard for approval of a motion under section 363 is whether there is a “good business reason” to support the motion
- holding that the standard for approval of a motion under section 363 is whether there is a “good business reason” to support the motion
- emphasizing the business judgment standard
- emphasizing the business judgment standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert E. Gerber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re General Motors Corp.S.D. New York· 2009-07-05· cited 71×
- In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.S.D. New York· 2005-05-20· cited 48×
- U.S. Bank Trust National Ass'n v. American Airlines, Inc. (In re AMR Corp.)S.D. New York· 2013-01-17· cited 39×
- In Re Quigley Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 2010-09-08· cited 34×
- RSL COMMUNICATIONS PLC v. BildiriciS.D. New York· 2009-08-14· cited 26×
- In re Rede Energia S.A.S.D. New York· 2014-08-27· cited 26×
- In Re Borders Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 2011-05-12· cited 23×
- Adelphia Communications Corp. v. Rigas (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)S.D. New York· 2005-03-24· cited 20×
- In Re Global Crossing Ltd.S.D. New York· 2003-07-24· cited 14×
- In re Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd.S.D. New York· 2014-05-16· cited 14×
- In re NII Holdings, Inc.S.D. New York· 2015-08-26· cited 12×
- In Re Metaldyne Corp.S.D. New York· 2009-07-28· cited 9×
- Signature Apparel Group LLC v. Laurita (In re Signature Apparel Group LLC)S.D. New York· 2017-08-24· cited 9×
- In re Nine W. Holdings, Inc.S.D. New York· 2018-07-02· cited 8×
- In re Diplomat Construction, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2012-09-18· cited 7×
- In re MannoneE.D. New York· 2014-05-20· cited 7×
- Madison Equities, LLC v. Condren (In Re Theatre Row Phase II Associates)S.D. New York· 2008-04-11· cited 6×
- In re MF Global Inc.S.D. New York· 2015-08-19· cited 4×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-03-14· cited 428×
- Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-02-04· cited 265×
- In Re Stn EnterprisesSecond Circuit· 1985-12-26· cited 136×
- Official Committee of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Resources, Inc. (In Re Integrated Resources, Inc.)S.D. New York· 1992-10-28· cited 84×
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. MusacchioN.D. California· 1988-06-17· cited 44×
- Clarkson Company Limited v. ShaheenSecond Circuit· 1981-09-15· cited 32×
- In Re Integrated Resources, Inc.S.D. New York· 1992-01-13· cited 28×
- Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd. v. Montgomery Ward Holding Corp. (In Re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp.)D. Delaware· 1999-11-24· cited 24×
- CRTF Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.S.D. New York· 1988-04-14· cited 17×
- Burton v. Exxon Corp.S.D. New York· 1984-04-18· cited 14×
- In Re Aerovox, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2001-10-31· cited 12×
- In Re America West Airlines, Inc.D. Arizona· 1994-08-26· cited 6×
- In Re Chateaugay CorporationSecond Circuit· 1992-08-24· cited 5×
Other cases named In Re Global Crossing Ltd.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.