In Re Gibellino-Schultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was not possible to grant relief from the stay because the discharge had already been entered but, with the consent of the parties, treated the motion as one to modify the discharge injunction
• treating motion for relief from stay as motion for modification of discharge injunction where § 362 stay expired while relief from stay motion was pending because debtor was granted discharge
• “Rather than have the parties undergo [unnecessary] time and expense, and with their consent, I shall treat the instant motion as having sought relief from the scope of section 524(a)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).