Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 2/15/2019

In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.

Citations

  • 368 F. Supp. 3d 814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to “dismiss . . . unjust enrichment claims based on Defendant’s argument regarding an adequate legal remedy”
  • “Illinois Brick does not bar [plaintiffs’] claims under . . . the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rufe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.