In Re Garner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because [Petitioner’s] initial habeas petition was decided ‘on the merits,’ his recent filings in our court are properly deemed a ‘second or successive’ petition.”
• “Because Garner’s initial habeas petition was decided ‘on the merits,’ his recent filings in our court are properly deemed a ‘second or successive’ petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Christopher Vialva
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-08-11· cited 58×
• United States v. Boukamp
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-06-25· cited 5×
• David Miller v. Tony Parker
  Sixth Circuit· 2018-11-28· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roper v. Simmons
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
• Atkins v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
• In Re: Benedict Joseph Cook, Iii, Movant
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-06-06· cited 121×
• Cooey v. Strickland
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-12-07· cited 84×
• Garner v. Mitchell
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-03-03· cited 76×
• Richard Henyard v. James McDonough
  Eleventh Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 38×
• In Re: Neville
  Fifth Circuit· 2006-02-08· cited 37×
• Cooey v. Strickland
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-05-12· cited 23×
• State v. Garner
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-02-02· cited 3×