Washington Supreme Court· 10/20/1955
In RE FRYE v. Delmore
Citations
- 288 P.2d 850
- 47 Wash. 2d 605
- 1955 Wash. LEXIS 392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conviction of being an habitual offender invalid because being an habitual offender was not a crime; judgment and sentence void
- conviction of being an habitual offender invalid because being an habitual offender was not a crime; judgment and sentence void
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 129×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 129×
- Freeman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1964-04-27· cited 36×
- State v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-12-28· cited 34×
- State v. JackovickWashington Supreme Court· 1960-10-13· cited 34×
- State v. KanistanauxWashington Supreme Court· 1966-05-26· cited 33×
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-04-15· cited 27×
- State v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court· 1980-02-21· cited 18×
- State v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-10-24· cited 11×
- Burke v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-07-21· cited 9×
- State v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-06· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.