California Court of Appeal· 12/28/1976
In Re Fain
Citations
- 65 Cal. App. 3d 376
- 135 Cal. Rptr. 543
- 1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 2220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Any deliberative body — administrative, judicial or legislative — has the inherent power to reconsider an action taken by it unless the action is such that it may not be set aside or unless reconsideration is precluded by law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rattigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-08-01· cited 1,989×
- Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-06-26· cited 64×
- In Re PowellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 58×
- Hupp v. Employment Security Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-03-07· cited 32×
- In Re StinnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-06-06· cited 32×
- In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-07-28· cited 25×
- People v. BilbreyCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-07-31· cited 23×
- In Re BrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-10-03· cited 20×
- In Re MorrallCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-02-11· cited 20×
- Freeny v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-06-04· cited 18×
- In Re SeabockCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-02-18· cited 17×
- Career Service Review Board v. Utah Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court· 1997-07-22· cited 16×
- In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-01-21· cited 14×
- In Re CaswellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-11-08· cited 14×
- In Re CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-03-24· cited 13×
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-05-30· cited 12×
- In Re DuarteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-06-15· cited 10×
- In Re GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-10-02· cited 10×
- In re the Authority to Conduct Savings & Loan Activities ex rel. Gate City Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court· 1979-07-03· cited 10×
- In Re WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-06-30· cited 9×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,832×
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-12-15· cited 112×
- In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-03-28· cited 95×
- In Re MinnisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-07-21· cited 87×
- Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-07-28· cited 76×
- Mandel v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-01-21· cited 76×
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-03-12· cited 71×
- People v. FainCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-03-13· cited 71×
- In Re PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-12-14· cited 68×
- In Re McLainCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-12-27· cited 56×
- Fain v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-02-24· cited 56×
- In Re MuszalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-10-27· cited 45×
- Mission Pak Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-01-26· cited 26×
- In Re StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-01-08· cited 22×
- Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-08-15· cited 20×
- People v. FainCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-06-15· cited 20×
- McDonald's Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-01-15· cited 19×
- Berman v. KlassmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-05-26· cited 11×
- Fleischer v. Adult AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-03-30· cited 9×
- In Re ClutchetteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-05-28· cited 8×
Other cases named In Re Fain
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.