In Re Duarte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the application of the DSL guidelines to a prisoner sentenced under the ISL did not violate the ex post facto clause
• “there has been neither a change in philosophy, nor a change in the criteria used to reach” a parole suitability decision.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Dannenberg
  California Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 225×
• In Re Jackson
  California Supreme Court· 1985-08-08· cited 67×
• Eugene Fred Connor v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-12-31· cited 23×
• People v. Martinez
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-01-11· cited 22×
• Morris v. Castro
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-03-26· cited 11×
• In Re Lawrence
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-22· cited 8×
• Ledesma v. Marshall
  E.D. California· 2009-08-05· cited 1×
• In re Riley
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. Graham
  Supreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
• People v. Morse
  California Supreme Court· 1964-01-07· cited 474×
• Medley
  Supreme Court· 1890-03-03· cited 349×
• In Re Schoengarth
  California Supreme Court· 1967-03-28· cited 95×
• People v. Ward
  California Supreme Court· 1958-08-19· cited 69×
• In Re Stanworth
  California Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 55×
• In Re Fain
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-12-28· cited 54×
• In Re Seabock
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-02-18· cited 17×