In Re Erika V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying relevant legal principles of adult restitution to analysis of juvenile restitution
• \parents are legally required to provide [juveniles] with necessary medical treatment\ and may be awarded restitution where they \stand[] in the shoes of the victim because [they are] legally required to suffer the victim's own precise loss\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Ryan A.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-02-12· cited 35×
• In Re Andrew C.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-21· cited 28×
• State v. Madrid
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-03-18· cited 23×
• In Re Richard B.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-07· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Tyler B.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-10-31· cited 3×
• In Re Eric W.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-02-23· cited 1×
• In Re Brendan G.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-04-02
• In Re Reynaldo P.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-08-02

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Action No. 5666-J
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-07-29· cited 73×
• State v. Merrill
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-19· cited 31×
• In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-128676
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-02-08· cited 29×
• State v. Lindsley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-23· cited 29×
• State v. French
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-01· cited 27×
• State v. Whitney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-17· cited 25×
• State v. Blanton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-01-26· cited 17×
• State v. Prieto
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-24· cited 5×