Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 4/23/2018

In Re: Erick Davila

Citations

  • 888 F.3d 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Davila fails to demonstrate how he was not reasonably on notice . . . . Davila’s own knowledge aside, we are unpersuaded that his counsel was not also reasonably on notice . . . .”
  • “We have held that [§ 2244(d)(1)(D)] means the date a petitioner is on notice of the facts which would support a claim, not the date on which the petitioner has in his possession evidence to support his claim.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dennis, Southwick, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re: Erick Davila

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.